hossein abavisani؛ maryam atharinia
چکیده
Jacques Derrida's deconstruction is both result and extension of Dusosaurian constructivism which is organized through precise and accurate defeat of contradictory semantic forces in the text. Thus, the text's claim diminishes in significance, and text itself gains more significance. Due to the text's abundance of empty spaces, unspoken words, and permeable gaps and It is reader's duty to complete these spaces and unspoken spaces throughout the process of continuous confirmation. The current study, conducted through a descriptive-analytical method, analyzed the story of AbuQir and AbuSir for a ...
بیشتر
Jacques Derrida's deconstruction is both result and extension of Dusosaurian constructivism which is organized through precise and accurate defeat of contradictory semantic forces in the text. Thus, the text's claim diminishes in significance, and text itself gains more significance. Due to the text's abundance of empty spaces, unspoken words, and permeable gaps and It is reader's duty to complete these spaces and unspoken spaces throughout the process of continuous confirmation. The current study, conducted through a descriptive-analytical method, analyzed the story of AbuQir and AbuSir for a period of one thousand and one nights to gain a new reading and a deeper understanding of how stories are created, and to acknowledge the social and cultural influences that shape it. And by revealing the hidden contradictions and angles in the story through the cues within the text, certainty has broken the original meaning of the story and the results indicate that the neither desirable fictional character AbuSir is, good, or absolutely good, nor AbuQir have personality of honor, evil, or absolutely evil but sometimes both thoughts and actions are measurable, contrary to appearance of the text. Breaks, empty spaces, and holes also contribute to its fragility, impressionability, and unreliability. The absence of content for comparison means that parts of story were relied upon by a third person, furthermore, utilize the techniques of rhetoric, such as the concept of Simile for singularity and altering meanings, are semantic proof holes in this work. and establish foundation for breaking the narrative structure of story.
